From the 1st of October, 2014 music videos became subjected to age ratings and restrictions similar to those used on films. All UK produced music videos will gain a 12, 15, 18 or R18 certificate, which will be displayed in the video description on sites like YouTube and Vevo. The aim of these classifications is to warn consumers about the video's content, as well as to give parents a greater control over the content their children are exposed to online. However, as these restrictions will only apply to music videos produced in the UK, any controversy caused by international artists will remain uncensored and easily accessible online without being labelled with an age restriction. This will mean that music videos containing graphic content, such as violence, sexual references and explicit language that are produced internationally, such as Rihanna's "B**** Better HAve My Money" will remain unaffected by the new age restricions designed to safeguard younger audiences.
Whilst I can understand the importance of these age classifications, which have the potential to protect children from harmful content. The American Psychological Association in 2007, found that the use of sexulaised images and themes in the media, advertising and music videos often causes depression, eating disorders and low self esteem in adolescents. Similarly, in 2009 Elsevier Health Sciences found a link between early sexual activity in American teenagers and the amount of popular songs with sexual references they are exposed to. There is abundant research suggesting a positive correlation between drug use or sexual activity with the amount of exposure adolescents have to questionable song lyrics. The potentially damaging effects of some of the content in popular music videos does mean that age restrictions are an important intervention to make, in combination with parental controls.
However, multiple critics find that the introduction of these regulations is a pointless exercise. Most children and teenagers are technologically competent enough to work around parental controls, meaning that placing an age rating of 15 or 18 on a video is simply going to make an adolescent more interested in the video's content. The ratings intended to protect children from harmful content could instead act as a flag, indicating to where the interesting and supposedly forbidden content is.
Another issue with age ratings is that videos without controversial or explicit content are often mistakenly restricted. This can prevent children from accessing content that could portray positive messages and increase their awareness of different cultures, ethnicities and sexualities. Videos containing same-sex relations and references to abuse are often targeted by regulation enforcers, which could prevent adolescents from accessing content that could help them through difficult times in their life whilst introducing them to support networks and welcoming communities. An example of age classification going wrong is Ira Sach's film "Love is Strange". Whilst containing no sex, nudity, drug use or violence, the video was given the rating "R" because it portrays a newly wed, elderly gay couple. This is a prine example of how classification is a subjective process which could result in multiple media texts positively promoting equality and diversity being restricted and hidden from audiences who may find the content enlightening.
As identifying elements within music videos that render them inappropriate for certain age groups is very much a mater of opinion, iit is hard to trust the ratings and restrictions created by the BBFC and websites like YouTube. With the introduction of these regulations, the question is now whether we can trust YouTube to act as the gatekeepers of content that younger generations can be exposed to.
As identifying elements within music videos that render them inappropriate for certain age groups is very much a mater of opinion, iit is hard to trust the ratings and restrictions created by the BBFC and websites like YouTube. With the introduction of these regulations, the question is now whether we can trust YouTube to act as the gatekeepers of content that younger generations can be exposed to.
Overall I understand the importance of regulations and age ratings for all media (including films, music videos and video game). However, I highly doubt that these ratings will make a major difference to the media content being explored by younger generations.
I believe that my music video would have the age rating of "PG", as although it discusses the sensitive topic of mental health and depression, it will contain no drug misuse, sexual behaviour, nudity or dangerous behaviour. These are all elements that indicate that a music video will need to be evaluated by the bbfc for age restrictive classification. I had considered introducing the element of addiction in my music video as part of the lyrics of the song "Lean" by "Have Mercy" reads "you need help and you can't quit". This could be interpreted that the character of the song has reached a stage of substance abuse or alcoholism that has reached the stage of dependency on the addictive substance. Because I didn't want to have controversial footage of drug misuse in my music video, I chose to interpret these lyrics as the protagonist of the music video needs help in changing his negative thinking. Although this interpretation will be harder to present, it will mean that my music video will have a lower age rating from the bbfc of "PG", making it accessible to a wider audience, as well as reducing the possibility of the audience misinterpreting the message of the music video.
I believe that my music video would have the age rating of "PG", as although it discusses the sensitive topic of mental health and depression, it will contain no drug misuse, sexual behaviour, nudity or dangerous behaviour. These are all elements that indicate that a music video will need to be evaluated by the bbfc for age restrictive classification. I had considered introducing the element of addiction in my music video as part of the lyrics of the song "Lean" by "Have Mercy" reads "you need help and you can't quit". This could be interpreted that the character of the song has reached a stage of substance abuse or alcoholism that has reached the stage of dependency on the addictive substance. Because I didn't want to have controversial footage of drug misuse in my music video, I chose to interpret these lyrics as the protagonist of the music video needs help in changing his negative thinking. Although this interpretation will be harder to present, it will mean that my music video will have a lower age rating from the bbfc of "PG", making it accessible to a wider audience, as well as reducing the possibility of the audience misinterpreting the message of the music video.
- http://www.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/article/33969075/age-rating-to-be-permanent-feature-on-online-music-videos
- https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/aug/18/age-ratings-uk-music-videos-youtube-vevo-miley-rihanna-dizzee-rascal
- https://www.theguardian.com/music/2014/aug/23/will-age-rating-classifications-music-video-work
- https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/02/070220005051.htm
- https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/jul/05/rihannas-video-bitch-better-have-my-money-misogynistic